Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Bike path regression....averted. Also, I am not alone!

Just a quick update on the bike path construction woes I posted yesterday.  I emailed with Jeff Mann in the Parks Department and was relieved to find out the patches they put in are temporary while some of the construction is ongoing.  I take the to mean the final product will be much improved.

I'd say I need to calm down, relax, and take a breath before firing off such posts (and emails)....but it seems I might be one of a select few watching such things.  And if being a pest results in path improvements verses degradation, then a pest I am happy to be!


Speaking of those select few....looks like about 4-6 walkers and one other intrepid bicyclist!  I saw as many as 4 sets of tracks in various places along the path.  I don't know why people don't ride when it snows....I think of these as some of the most fun commutes!  I mean come on, it's like being a six year old.  Power slides through the corners, covered in slush and mud, 20 foot skid to the intersection with stop signs.  Best riding ever!

That being said, there was one power slide / skid I could have done without this morning.  It was here at the blind s-curve (where locust st. terminates at the river in an apartment complex).


While the image above may not be to scale....I meet a RPD cruiser right in the blind spot of the s-curve that was covered in snow and has a pretty good off angle slope.  I was moving along at a pretty good clip and so was he....fortunately, we avoided a head on collision.  Although my resulting two foot down, both wheels locked power slide was not graceful.

I always ring my bell before entering this corner and I did so today.  He had a window down but obviously didn't hear it.  I wish he would have give a quick beep of the horn since he uses both lanes.  Either way I'm glad to see RPD in any form out on the river trail.  In fact if they increase the number of patrol passes, I promise to work on improving the grace factor of my power slides!

Monday, February 6, 2012

Just a reminder.... this event is tonight from 5-7pm at Lawlor.

From the RGJ:



blog post photoCondensed from a press release:

The University of Nevada, Reno will host a Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Forum for both the campus community and the community at-large 5-7 p.m., Feb. 6, in Lawlor Events Center’s Silver and Blue Room. The public forum will allow for discussion of laws, problem areas and what local agencies are doing to promote safety on the University campus and its surrounding community. Public concerns, suggestions and input will be encouraged.

In addition to University Police and a number of University departments, other agencies involved with the forum are the City of Reno Neighborhood Advisory Boards, Nevada Department of Transportation, Nevada Highway Patrol, Nevada Office of Traffic Safety, Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), Reno Police Department and others. Wendy Damonte, KTVN Channel 2 news anchor, will moderate the forum.

Agencies represented will briefly present information on their safety efforts during the past year, current projects and future plans. The RTC will present plans for area streets and additional crosswalks. Troopers from the Nevada Highway Patrol will discuss their concentrated enforcement efforts on pedestrian and crosswalk violations over the next several weeks. The University Police Department will share its partnership with the 11- to 17-year-old gifted students at the Davidson Academy, located on campus, to improve pedestrian safety around campus. The motto of this program, created by the Davidson students is, “Look Up, Unplug, Stay Safe.”

There will be informational displays and handouts, and agency representatives will be on hand to answer questions. Public parking will be available on the top two floors of the Brian J. Whalen Parking Complex on North Virginia Street.

Kings Canyon to Ash Canyon Trail Public Meeting

Taken from MusclePowered.  

Kings Canyon to Ash Canyon Trail Public Meeting
February 13th 5-7 p.m.
Carson City Community Center- Bonanza Room
851 East Williams Street

IMG_1057.jpg

Lumos & Associates’ Tom Young and Chas Macquarie survey the Ash Creek bridge site

Carson City and Muscle Powered have been working with the U.S. Forest Service and public for many years to develop a trail system along the foothills of the Carson Range with connectivity to Carson City. Most of the trail will be located on Forest Service lands and some will be on Carson City lands.

The project proposes to construct approximately 6 miles of single-track trail designed for non-motorized uses including mountain biking, hiking and equestrian between Ash Canyon and Kings Canyon. Trail access points will be Kings Canyon Road, Waterfall Road, and Ash Canyon Road
This meeting is one of the last steps before we can start construction on what is sure to be a fantastic trail!

If you would like to learn more about this project,  have questions, or would like to show support for the trail, please attend this meeting.

Thanks!

Regression....to hoping.

The river path is a resource.....sometimes for runners, sometimes for cyclists, and sometimes for less desirable locals.  It is however, a resource (even infrastructure) and a really nice option if you need to travel between Reno and Sparks without using a car.  It is worth protecting and repairing and making every attempt to keep it up.  It's not that hard.  A phone call to the right place can go a long way. I still am impressed that one call to the Parks Department resulted in the number of lights working along the path going from 47% to over 90%!

Not everyone realizes this.  And in this case I mean these guys:


They were pretty good on the surface....they had ped/bike detour signs and took down the closure when they weren't actively working on the site.  However, their attention to detail on the reconstruction of the path leaves a lot to be desired. 

The work they did required a trench to be cut across the path and then the northern section of the path to have about 12-16 inches cut away.  Presumably to get access to some pipe, wire, etc.  They then should have back filled to a level grade and patched their work with fresh compacted and rolled asphalt.  They kind of did this.....





Except that they neglected to back fill to an adequate grade, lay the asphalt at the correct temperature, compact the asphalt roll it smooth, etc.  The result is a patch that is below grade (a noticeable bump) that will only compact further with time, the asphalt they did lay is already crumbling as you can see in the photos and has a large number of small open holes.  So they used too little asphalt and didn't compact it properly. 

In addition the strip they "replaced" along the northern edge of the trail is seriously graded (sloping) to the north.  An inattentive or inexperienced person catching this edge could easily be angled into the loose pea gravel and then down the river bank in a rather unfashionable method.   It's also about as smoothly rolled as a motocross track.

So all the details aside....we shouldn't have to tolerate this type of second class quality on our paths.  We wouldn't tolerate it if they guys rebuilding interstate 80 left us with this type of infrastructure!  Why is it ok to treat the non vehicle infrastructure in this way?

Hopefully, it's not.  Hopefully, a call to the Parks Department will have these guys back on site to fix their initial mess.  So I guess here's to hoping!

Saturday, February 4, 2012

You can do anything on a bicycle!

I found this little gem on a blog I read regularly.  If you thought daily life can't be conducted from the seat of a bicycle have a look!


THE MAN WHO LIVED ON HIS BIKE from Guillaume Blanchet on Vimeo.

Then if you want to check out a cool girl on a bike, check out the blog I found it on!

Friday, February 3, 2012

The Green Lane Project.

While Reno might not be applying for these programs yet, it's exciting to see that these projects are being pushed in some of the "leading" bicycle friendly cities. 


Green Lane Project from Bikes Belong on Vimeo.

My understanding is, to be selected as one of the six cities to get funding for this type of project, the city must "have a plan or vision that is supported by elected officials, leading staff, and the community."  I'd say we have the plan (thank you BPAC), the leading staff, and even support in the community.  It looks like what we really need is some elected officials who will step up to the plate....

And just so you don't think Reno could possibly qualify for such a program while competing against larger cities like Chicago and Portland.  The application states it's not just about which city is the leader in bike infrastructure, rather that cities chosen will range from "known leaders" to areas that are "just embarking on making space for bikes."

Who knows....maybe Reno should apply!?

Bike funding defeated....1950's mentality here we come!

This article is take from the League of American Bicyclists.  Written by: Darren Flusche

Strong fight from Rep. Petri & others, but pro-bike amendment defeated by two votes

Representative Tom Petri (R-WI) and his colleagues Timothy Johnson (R-IL), and Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ) showed themselves today to be strong and brave defenders of biking and walking, a balanced transportation system, and livable communities. Thanks also to Daniel Lipinski (D-IL) for co-sponsoring the pro-biking amendment and all of the democrats who votes for it.

The amendment lost by just two votes. This was a strong showing in a very difficult political environment. The House leadership strongly opposed the amendment, so our thanks goes to Reps. Petri, Johnson, and LoBiondo for standing with their constituents and people everywhere who value walking and biking. If these Congressmen represent you, please let them know you recognize their efforts.

Watch this inspired performance from Representative Peter DeFazio (D-OR) in which he says we’re going back to the pre-1980s in this country:




Let’s keep the fight going at the National Bike Summit.

Here’s the breakdown of the vote. Remember, votes for the Petri amendment are good for biking and walking programs and votes against are bad.

Votes in favor of pro-bike Petri amendment

Altmire (D-PA)
Bernice-Johnson (D-TX)
Bishop (D-NY)
Boswell (D-IA)
Brown (D-FL)
Capuano (D-MA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Cohen (D-TN)
Costello (D-IL)
Cummings (D-MD)
DeFazio (D-OR)
Edwards (D-MD)
Hinrono (D-HI)
Holden (D-PA)
Johnson (D-TX)
Johnson (R-IL)
Larsen (D-WA)
Lipinski (D-IL)
LoBiondo (R-NJ)
Michaud (D-ME)
Nadler (D-NY)
Napolitano (D-CA)
Norton (D-DC)
Petri (R-WI)
Richardson (D-CA)
Shuler (D-NC)
Walz (D-MN)

Votes against Petri amendment

Barletta (R-PA)
Buschon (R-IN)
Capito (R-WV)
Coble (R-NC)
Cravaack (R-MN)
Crawford (R-AR)
Denham (R-CA)
Duncan (R-TN)
Farenthold (R-TX)
Fleischmann (R-TN)
Gibbs (R-OH)
Graves (R-MO)
Guinta (R-NH)
Hanna (R-NY)
Harris (R-MD)
Herrera Beutler (R-WA)
Hultgren (R-IL)
Hunter (R-CA)
Landry (R-LA)
Lankford (R-OK)
Long (R-MO)
Meehan (R-PA)
Mica (R-FL)
Miller (R-CA)
Miller (R-MI)
Ribble (R-WI)
Schmidt (R-OH)
Shuster (R-PA)
Southerland (R-FL)